The issue in this case is whether the Cork City Council is liable for the damage to Hannah’s property and/or to the car. In order to establish this, we must decide whether the Council is liable for misfeasance (the negligent repair of a road or footpath) not nonfeasance (a failure by the Council to act to maintain roads and footpaths).
The Civil Liability Act 1961 Section 60 (1) states that “A road authority shall be liable for damage caused as a result of their failure to maintain adequately a public road.”(1) In the case of McCabe v. South Dublin County Council, the judge held that the Council were not liable to the injury of a lady in Tallaght who tripped and fell as her foot got stuck in an opening in the surface of a footpath.(2) It must be established that the Council negligently repaired the opening.
In the facts of this case, although Cork County Council did not fix the pothole on Hannah’s road despite her numerous attempts to contact them, it is not apparent that the Council negligently repaired the pothole. If the Council adequately failed to repair the pothole, then they would be liable for damages caused by misfeasance. However, the Council failing to act to repair the pothole does not constitute misfeasance.
Therefore, it is unlikely that the Council will be liable for damages done to Hannah’s property and/or to the car.
[1] Civil Liability Act 1961, S. 60 (1).
[2] McCabe v. South Dublin County Council [2014] IEHC 529.